Thus, it was said in The Book of Rand “The trees shall become timber and grass shall be laid in concrete and the air shall smell of gasoline. In this way shall your greed be satisfied. Thus, shall you build up your mansions, as you rob the widow and the orphan. In this way, shall the beasts of the field become runway purses and wall ornaments.” – The Book of Rand
“You shall pay no heed to the earth, nor shall you work towards its conservation. You shall not heed the word of the conservationist. You shall hunt the beast of the field to extinction. You shall lay the flesh of these beasts before yourself. You shall take the flesh of these beasts and grill it medium-rare. You shall take the first portion of the flesh and lay it at your own table. You can gorge yourselves. You shall call yourselves gluttons and gloat on your gluttoness” – The Book of Rand
Mankind should hunt creatures capable of putting up a good fight. A two-foot rabbit is not a match for a six-foot man. I would hardly call the game fair. This is bully play. The fight is less equal than a heavy weight pounding a toddler.
A good match-up would be a samurai soldier v. bear fight. I am not so crazy, as to say, a man should go naked.
A bear is covered in fur. A bear is bigger and stronger. The sword, armor, and the superior intelligence of the man should equal the match and should place the game on equal ground. I would call the set-up match true sport.
Man-or-woman-behind-bushes or trees v. unsuspecting deer on-all-fours-licking-salt-off-dirt is not sport. It is murder.
The man or woman is shooting the opponent, while their back is turned.
If the match-up arrangement were a man or woman in the position of the deer, new stations, print or web publications would claim the arrangement a coward’s set up.
We must insist this field set-up arrangement is a case equal here.
Beasts and humans are related. They share, at least, a tiny portion of the same DNA down the evolutionary line. So, beast and humans are distant cousins. So, they should be given equal credence.
The United States must attempt to implement fairness in our national sport event pastimes.
The U.S. must say the arrangement is at least equal to man shooting an unarmed man or woman behind a bush, while his or her back is turned.
American’s must insist the person does not even have the guts to face the deer aware and in an open space.
I think unfair sporting arrangements should be outlawed. I think only fair play should play out. I think an article should be penned and placed in the U.S. Constitution embedding this concept.
The Romans, while brutal, at least knew how to arrange a fair set-up against human and beast.
Old Spain was more progressive in arranging equal mammal matches than the United States.
The Spanish knew how a human v. beast match should be laid down – Matador v. Bull – now, that is a good set-up, when not tampered with.
What could show an individual’s toughness and sportsmanship more than charging and maneuvering against the horns and stamina of a bull?
The match is more fair and entertaining – dare I say more humane – than a slaughterhouse.
In the Roman arena, a gladiator was placed in armor and carried a sharp and deadly object.
The gladiator could face the swifter beast, bearing claws and teeth, with their superior intelligence; while slicing, whacking, and stabbing the animal with this sharp object.
I say if a man or woman wants to hunt a beast, they should step into a modern gladiatorial ring or like sporting grounds with a beast of equal power.
I say let the best mammal win. I say let the match begin.
What's All the Hype Man? 