SJWs ( i.e. social justice warriors) are racist. They are racist because they are obsessed with skin pigmentation and cultural background.
SJWs insist a person’s ancestors are more important than the individual. This attitude is antithetical to progress.
If you are a white, straight male you cannot have an opinion on trends of a people group different than your own. This attitude is supposed to be about being inclusive. Sadly, this attitude spurs on the opposite response.
It puts someone of normative behavior trends, who comes from the dominant regional cultural group, in a peculiar position. Suddenly, the right to comment on cultural behavior different than their perceived norm have been made null and void.
It does not matter this person’s statements are correct or incorrect. Those of the dominating cultural group cannot discuss them because they are of the normative group of a region.
It also bad, apparently, to adopt innovative ideas from a neighboring culture. Suddenly, a behavioral trade, which had spurred on progress through the history of humankind, is racist.
So, from this, one can gather they hate much of the great cultural thought leading to insights into our psychology and sociology.
So, evidently, one can gather they hate the foundations and developments of the cultures around the world they seek to ambassador for or appease
This evaluation is evident because the cultures from around the world borrowed traits of the various groups they came into contact with from war, trade or discovery.
When these groups met with one another they had opinions of one another’s behavior. These opinions ranged from positive to negative. These groups took what they liked and discarded what they did not like or did not find useful.
Off course, these opinions may have been influenced by their personal bias based upon the contrast these behaviors had to the culture they were raised with. It does not matter. The importance was some of these groups put pen to paper to communicate their opinions to others. Those others who lent an ear to these opinions could decide whether these opinions were based upon rational critic, ignorance or intolerance.